|
詳細: HostKvm: 50 元/月/1GB メモリ/20GB スペース/650GB トラフィック/KVM/シンガポール/日本/香港。私は以前、HostKvm のシンガポール高帯域幅 VPS をレビューしました: HostKvm 1GB メモリ シンガポール KVM VPS レビュー。今回は、どちらも 100M の高帯域幅を備えた日本 VPS をレビューします。 1. システム情報、帯域幅、I/Oテスト CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 2199.998 MHz Total size of Disk : 20.0 GB (0.8 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 993 MB (29 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 254 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days 0 hour 1 min Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 OS : CentOS 7.1.1503 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 3.10.0-229.1.2.el7.x86_64 Virt : kvm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 80.6 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 626 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 148 MB/s Average I/O speed : 284.9 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 53.77 Mbit/s 68.25 Mbit/s 4.213 ms Xiangyang CT 53.89 Mbit/s 56.28 Mbit/s 131.93 ms Shanghai CT 56.68 Mbit/s 31.33 Mbit/s 86.681 ms Chengdu CT 43.22 Mbit/s 29.63 Mbit/s 109.944 ms Xi'an CU 49.91 Mbit/s 45.40 Mbit/s 103.874 ms Shanghai CU 48.99 Mbit/s 52.70 Mbit/s 57.012 ms Chongqing CU 54.95 Mbit/s 46.21 Mbit/s 98.338 ms Xi'an CM 65.24 Mbit/s 63.42 Mbit/s 63.974 ms Shanghai CM 2.86 Mbit/s 3.66 Mbit/s 929.575 ms Chengdu CM 11.72 Mbit/s 23.67 Mbit/s 221.691 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 4 min 33 sec Current time : 2018-06-09 01:51:59 Finished！
2. アップロード/ダウンロード帯域幅テスト Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by OPEN Project (via 20G SINET) (Tokyo) [5.41 km]: 4.987 ms Testing download speed................................... Download: 68.56 Mbit/s Testing upload speed..................................... Upload: 59.83 Mbit/s
3. 国内アクセス速度
4. ハードディスクI/Oパフォーマンステスト dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 9.29619 s, 28.9 MB/s
5. Unixベンチ Benchmark Run: Sat Jun 09 2018 04:34:39 - 05:02:49 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 22467516.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2833.4 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1813.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 589925.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 170649.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1552900.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1094229.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 206124.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4272.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4289.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1026.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1609323.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 22467516.3 1925.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2833.4 515.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 1813.2 421.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 589925.9 1489.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 170649.9 1031.1 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1552900.6 2677.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1094229.1 879.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 206124.9 515.3 Process Creation 126.0 4272.5 339.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4289.1 1011.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1026.0 1710.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1609323.3 1072.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 942.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Jun 09 2018 05:02:49 - 05:31:06 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 45699369.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 5611.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5829.6 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 808160.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 223948.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2431860.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2177843.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 396867.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 15314.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7744.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1085.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2602131.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 45699369.7 3916.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5611.9 1020.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 5829.6 1355.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 808160.5 2040.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 223948.8 1353.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2431860.8 4192.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2177843.1 1750.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 396867.3 992.2 Process Creation 126.0 15314.3 1215.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7744.1 1826.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1085.7 1809.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2602131.7 1734.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1737.9
6. パケットロステスト Ping from 10.0.0.16 to 103.27.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 06/09 09:55:43.547 Ping to 103.27.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 06/09 09:55:43.705 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 103.27.xxx.xxx: time=91ms TTL=49, ave=91.00ms 06/09 09:55:44.629 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 103.27.xxx.xxx: time=88ms TTL=49, ave=89.50ms 06/09 09:55:45.629 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 103.27.xxx.xxx: time=87ms TTL=49, ave=88.67ms 06/09 09:55:47.663 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 103.27.xxx.xxx: time=121ms TTL=49, ave=95.00ms 06/09 09:56:21.625 PingMin #39 Reply 32 bytes from 103.27.xxx.xxx: time=86ms TTL=49, ave=90.72ms 06/09 09:56:34.610 PingMin #52 Reply 32 bytes from 103.27.xxx.xxx: time=71ms TTL=53, ave=89.98ms 06/09 09:56:49.608 PingMin #67 Reply 32 bytes from 103.27.xxx.xxx: time=70ms TTL=53, ave=85.87ms 06/09 09:57:22.614 === 100 有效發送, 100 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 82.08ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/06/09 09:55:43經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/06/09 09:57:22 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送100 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值70ms, 最大值121ms, 平均值82.08ms
7. ルート追跡<br /> 通信
中国聯通
動く
8. YouTube スピードテスト
|
